Nottinghamshire County Council (20 007 285)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Dec 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms B’s complaint that the Council is at fault in failing to carry out work to a highway tree. This is because it is unlikely we would find fault on the Council’s part.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Ms B, complains that the Council is at fault in failing to carry out work to a highway tree.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe it is unlikely we would find fault. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Ms B has said in support of her complaint and in response to my draft decision. I have also considered the complaint correspondence provided by the Council, the Council’s Tree Conservation and Maintenance Policy, and its Highway Network Management Plan.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Ms B says a highway tree close to her property requires pruning. She says the tree is dangerous and branches have fallen onto her property. The Council has declined to prune it and it is against this decision that Ms B complains. I support of her complaint, she contends that another highway tree, which was causing similar issues, has been pruned. She wants to know why the Council decided to prune one tree and not the other.
  2. It is not for the Ombudsman to take a view on whether the work Ms B has asked for is appropriate. That is a matter for the professional judgement of the Council’s officers. The Council has decided not to carry out the work. Ms B disagrees with this decision, but that does not mean it amounts to fault on the Council’s part.
  3. The question for the Ombudsman is whether there is evidence to suggest fault in the way the Council made its decision. I can see no such evidence. The Council has explained why it does not believe the work is warranted, and this decision appears to be in line with the relevant policies. That being the case, it is unlikely we would find fault on the Council’s part. There are no grounds for the Ombudsman to intervene, or to consider matters around the decision to prune another tree.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because it is unlikely we would find fault on the Council’s part.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings