Bristol City Council (20 007 077)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Dec 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s refusal to compensate him for damage to his property when a tree on Council land caused damage in a storm. We should not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint. This is because the complaint concerns liability for damage to property and only insurers and the courts can decide this.

The complaint

  1. Mr X says he reported a tree near his property gates as being unsafe due to insecure branches. The Council inspected the tree but did not consider it required immediate attention. When the tree damaged his gateway with falling branches, he submitted a claim, but it was rejected by the Council’s insurers. He wants the Council to accept liability for the damage to his gateway which amounted to nearly £1,500.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered all the information which Mr X submitted with his complaint. Mr X has been given an opportunity to comment on a draft copy of my decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X says his gateposts and fence where damaged by branches which fell from a tree growing on Council land. He says he had contacted the Council previously and informed it about the state of the tree. The Council inspected the tree but did not consider it required urgent attention. The Tree Officer decided that it would be safe until bees nesting in the tree had left after the summer.
  2. The damage was caused when branches fell from the tree during a summer storm. Mr X submitted a claim against the Council, but its insurers rejected it and denied liability for the damage.
  3. The Ombudsman does not normally investigate complaints about damage to property or personal injury. These are legal claims about the tort of negligence and can only be determined by insurers or the courts. The Council has denied liability for Mr X’s claim and it is reasonable for him to take the matter to the Small Claims Court if he remains dissatisfied.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We should not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint. This is because the complaint concerns liability for damage to property and only insurers and the courts can decide this.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings