Bristol City Council (19 002 325)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Aug 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr A’s complaint that the Council has refused to accept responsibility for maintaining a tree outside his property. This is because it is unlikely we would find fault on the Council’s part.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr A, complains that the Council has refused to accept responsibility for maintaining a tree outside his property.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe it is unlikely we would find fault. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Mr A has said in support of his complaint and the complaint correspondence provided by the Council. I have also considered what Mr A has said in response to my draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. There is a tree on unregistered land outside Mr A’s property. Mr A complains that the Council is at fault in refusing to accept responsibility for maintaining or removing the tree. The tree is subject to a Tree Preservation Order. Mr A argues that, as the Order prevents anyone else maintaining the tree, the Council should accept responsibility.
  2. The Council has said that it does not own the tree and does not regard it as dangerous. That being the case, it is not required to take action and will not do so.
  3. The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr A’s complaint because it is unlikely that we would find fault on the Council’s part. The Council is not required to carry out works to a tree on unregistered land, other than in the circumstances it has set out. There is no evidence of fault in the way the Council has responded to the matter and no grounds for the Ombudsman to intervene.
  4. Although the tree is protected by a Tree Preservation Order, Mr A may apply for permission to carry out works if he wishes to do so. If the Council refuses permission, he has the right to appeal to the Secretary of State.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because it is unlikely we would find fault on the Council’s part.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings