High Peak Borough Council (26 012 333)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 02 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint about the Council charging him for a replacement bin. This is because it is unlikely an investigation would achieve a meaningful outcome and Mr B has not suffered a serious injustice which would justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr B complains his bin was damaged during collection but the Council says he must pay for a replacement bin.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. This means we will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures. We will not normally investigate a complaint where the alleged loss or injustice is not a serious or significant matter.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr B considers the damage to his bin was caused by the mechanical device in the Council’s refuse vehicle. The Council says the damage was caused by natural wear and tear. The Council says in such circumstances the resident is responsible for paying for a new bin.
  2. It is highly unlikely an investigation would allow us to make sound findings about the cause of the damage to Mr B’s bin. And, the £34 fee for the delivery of a new bin is relatively modest. I find Mr B has not suffered a serious or significant injustice which would justify public money being spent on an investigation.
  3. So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because it is unlikely an investigation would achieve a meaningful outcome. And, Mr B has not suffered a serious injustice which would justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings