What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

East Cambridgeshire District Council (26 010 300)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr C’s complaint about the Council’s response to his complaint about waste collection changes. This is because Mr C may put in a Freedom of Information request for the information he seeks, and if needed, complain to the Information Commissioner.

The complaint

  1. Mr C complains the Council has failed to address the issues he raised in his complaint about changes to the Council’s waste collection service. Mr C says the Council has just provided general statements and has not provided the evidence he requested or answered his specific questions about the decision to introduce these changes. Mr C does not consider the Council has been transparent or genuinely engaged with his complaint.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr C.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We would not normally investigate a complaint which is solely about complaint handling.
  2. This is because an investigation is unlikely to be a good use of our limited resources or provide a meaningful outcome for the person who has complained.
  3. I find an investigation into the Council’s handling of Mr C’s complaint is not justified. Mr C may request information from the Council under the Freedom of Information Act, and if needed, complain to the Information Commissioner. I find this is the most appropriate route for the issue Mr C complains about and it is reasonable for Mr C to do this.
  4. So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr C’s complaint because it is reasonable for him to put in a Freedom of Information request, and if needed, complain to the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings