Southend-on-Sea City Council (25 015 602)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to change his refuse collection from waste bags to wheelie bins because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council replaced his bagged refuse collection with wheelie bins. Mr X said he has limited storage space for the bins as he lives in a mid-terrace property.
  2. Mr X said the matter caused him distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. The Council recently implemented a policy to collect household waste via “wheelie bins”. The Environmental Protection Act 1990 gives the Council the power to prescribe the type of waste container to be used to access its waste collection services.
  2. In its complaint response, the Council explained it assessed Mr X’s property and found sufficient space available for him to store wheelie bins. Mr X disagreed.
  3. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong.
  4. Although Mr X disagrees with the Council’s assessment, there is insufficient evidence of fault in its decision making to warrant an investigation, and so we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings