Cambridge City Council (25 008 589)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s management of public bins. This is because there is not significant enough personal injustice to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council is not using the appropriate bin liners in its public bins. He says this means recyclable waste is not being separated from non-recyclable waste, which means all waste is going to landfill. He says this is causing him stress. He wants the Council to better monitor how public waste is being managed.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Our role is to consider complaints where the person bringing the complaint has suffered significant personal injustice as a direct result of the actions or inactions of the organisation. This means we will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures. We will not normally investigate a complaint where the alleged loss or injustice is not a serious or significant matter.
  2. Although I recognise the subject of the complaint is important to Mr X, I do not consider there has been significant enough personal injustice to warrant the Ombudsman devoting time and public money to investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough significant personal injustice to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings