Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council (25 007 645)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decision she needs to pay for delivery of a new refuse bin. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains about the Council’s decision she needs to pay £31 for delivery of a new refuse bin after hers was damaged during a collection. Mrs X says she purchased the bin herself when she moved to the property seven years ago and she cannot afford to pay for delivery of a new bin.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  3. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained to the Council about the matter set out in paragraph one, above.
  2. The Council told Mrs X that, in line with its policy, it charges for delivery of new bins when a bin is more than five years old. Its policy states: “If your bin is damaged and less than five years old, we’ll replace it free of charge…If your bin is more than five years old you need to pay for a new one, even if you think it was damaged when it was being emptied.”
  3. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council here to warrant an investigation. It is applying the charge in line with its published policy. As Mrs X’s bin is more than five years old the £31 delivery charge applies for a new bin.
  4. We are not an appeal body. Our role is not to ask whether we agree with the Council’s decision. Instead, we look at whether there was fault in how it made its decision. If, as here, we decide there was no fault in how it made its decision we cannot consider it regardless of whether Mrs X disagrees with it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings