Stafford Borough Council (25 004 556)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a missed refuse collection. This is because the injustice is not significant enough to justify investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council failed to collect her domestic waste, and took too long to correct this. She says this caused an environmental hazard and problems with her neighbours. She seeks financial compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)).
  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint unless we are satisfied the organisation knows about the complaint and has had an opportunity to investigate and reply. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to notify the organisation of the complaint and give it an opportunity to investigate and reply. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(5), section 34(B)6).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained to the Council in January 2025 that it did not empty her recyclable waste bin or garden waste.
  2. The Council replied Ms X had not presented her recyclable waste bin for collection at the required time. It also said she had not subscribed to the garden waste collection.
  3. Ms X stated in a complaint about another service area that the Council’s reply was false. And she said it delayed collecting the waste. This caused inconvenience, and led to environmental concerns and harassment from her neighbours.
  4. The Council replied in its response regarding another service area that Ms X could complain to the Council.
  5. It is not clear whether Ms X raised a further complaint specifically about waste collection as the Council advised.
  6. We would normally expect a complainant to pursue a complaint through the Council’s procedures. However, it is not reasonable or necessary to expect the Council to consider it now and so I have exercised our discretion to consider the complaint without completing the complaints procedure.
  7. The complaint relates to one missed collection and the inconvenience this caused. Therefore, I consider the injustice is not significant, and it does not warrant investigation by the Ombudsman.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough injustice to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings