Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (25 003 668)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council has charged him for a replacement bin. There is not enough evidence of fault and in any case any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains a Council refuse vehicle damaged his bin and the Council has said he must pay for a replacement.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council and said a refuse vehicle had damaged his bin. He was unhappy the Council had said it would charge him for a replacement. He sent photographs of his bin showing it had a split.
  2. The Council responded and explained that the bins degraded over time and cracks and splits would occur as normal wear and tear. It referenced its policy which said it could charge for replacement bins. It said the photographs did not prove how the bin had been damaged.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint as there is not enough evidence of fault. There is no evidence to show how the bin was damaged. The Council is entitled to charge for replacement bins. Furthermore, the cost of a replacement bin is less than £30. Therefore, any injustice to Mr X is not sufficient enough to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault and in any case any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings