Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (25 001 826)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 May 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint about a replacement bin provided by the Council. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs B complains that when she paid for a new general waste bin to replace her damaged bin, the Council provided a smaller bin. Mrs B says this new 180 litre bin is not large enough for her household. Mrs B would like the Council to provide a bin which is the same size as her previous bin.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs B and information on the Council’s website.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has decided to provide households with a 180 litre general waste bin. The Council’s policy says only households of five or more people may request a bigger or additional general waste bin. The Council says the replacement bin is the correct size for Mrs B’s household of four people. The Council has explained that previously having a larger bin does not automatically entitle a household to a replacement bin of the same size.
  2. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation into Mrs B’s complaint. The information indicates the Council has acted in line with its policy. It is not our role to tell the Council this policy is wrong.
  3. So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings