East Lindsey District Council (24 009 806)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the refuse crew throwing rubbish into the complainant’s garden. This is because there is insufficient evidence of injustice.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains a member of the refuse crew threw two yoghurt pots into his garden. Mr X also complains about the Council’s handling of his complaint.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council that a member of the refuse threw two yoghurt pots into his garden. Mr X gave the Council CCTV of the incident. Mr X says the Council acknowledged his report but did not provide a response.
  2. The Council says it apologised to Mr X and explained the conduct of the crew member would be considered by a manager. The Council says it did not say the outcome of this consideration would be shared with Mr X.
  3. I appreciate the incident with the rubbish may have been annoying and not what a resident would expect. I also acknowledge Mr X says the Council has not responded properly to his complaint. However, the impact of both issues does not represent a degree of injustice which requires an investigation. This applies even if Mr X were to dispute the Council provided either an apology or an update. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we have decided not to deal with the substantive issue due to a lack of injustice.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings