Peterborough City Council (20 001 563)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jul 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about damage to the complainant’s car. This is because it is a matter that needs to be determined in court.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Mr X, says the Council is responsible for damage caused to his car during the refuse collection. Mr X wants the Council to pay for the new tyre he had to buy.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. The courts decide issues of negligence and claims for damages.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I read the complaint and the Council’s responses. I invited Mr X to comment on this draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

What happened

  1. Mr X had to fit a new tyre to his car after it was damaged by glass.
  2. Mr X made an insurance claim to the Council as he thought the Council was responsible. The insurers rejected the claim and said the Council was not liable.
  3. The Council explained that a resident had left a pane of glass in a bin. The refuse van hit the pane and smashed the glass. The crew swept up the glass and the photographs showed no obvious signs of glass when the van left. The Council said it could not be foreseen that a car could be damaged. The Council suggested Mr X get legal advice. Mr X told the Council he would take action in the small claims court.

Assessment

  1. I will not start an investigation because this is a matter for the courts. The Ombudsman does not act as an appeal body and does not determine claims for damages or make decisions about liability and negligence. It would be for the courts to decide if the Council has been negligent and whether it should compensate Mr X for the damaged tyre.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I will not start an investigation because claims for damages need to be determined by the courts.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings