Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council (19 019 746)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Not upheld

Decision date : 08 Jul 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman has discontinued his investigation of this complaint, about a replacement bin. This is because there is insufficient evidence of injustice.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, to whom I refer as Mrs J, says the Council wrongly removed her general waste bin. After she complained, the Council agreed to replace it, but the bin it supplied was unclean. Mrs J complains the Council has refused to provide a clean replacement bin.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe the injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I reviewed Mrs J’s correspondence with the Ombudsman.
  2. I also shared a draft copy of this decision with each party for their comments.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mrs J says she left her bin out for a private collection in November 2019. Despite informing the Council of this, she says it confiscated the bin.
  2. After complaining to the Council, it agreed in January 2020 to replace the bin free of charge. However, Mrs J says the bin the Council provided was unclean.
  3. Mrs J complained again to the Council. In response, the Council said it had visited her property the previous day to leave the replacement bin, but had found one already on site. It would therefore not leave a second bin.
  4. Mrs J subsequently referred her complaint to the Ombudsman. She says she cannot use the bin she believes the Council provided, as it is dirty and smelly.

Back to top

Analysis

  1. Mrs J believes the Council has provided an unclean replacement bin, while the Council says it has not provided a replacement bin at all, as Mrs J already had one when it visited the property. It is unclear how this has happened.
  2. However, whatever the facts, Mrs J has a functioning bin. I appreciate she says it is unclean, but I do not see how this could prevent her from using it. I do not consider this to represent a significant injustice.
  3. I cannot say whether there has been any fault in the Council’s handling of this matter. But investigations by the Ombudsman are at public expense; and, as I do not consider Mrs J has suffered an injustice, it would not be appropriate to complete an investigation here.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I have discontinued my investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings