Sunderland City Council (19 018 666)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Mar 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that a Council refuse vehicle made a short-cut through a bus-only route. This is because an investigation is unlikely to enable us to establish whether there was fault.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Mr B, says he saw a Council refuse vehicle making a short-cut through a bus lane/bus only route.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. We refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the Council, or
  • it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered:
    • Mr B’s complaint to the Ombudsman;
    • The correspondence between Mr B and the Council.
  2. I also gave Mr B the opportunity to comment on a draft version of this statement.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr B contacted the Council to report that he had seen a refuse vehicle using a bus-lane route. The Council says its Refuse Department checked their vehicle’s trackers, and confirmed it was not one of their vehicles. The Council suggested it could have been another refuse company with similarly liveried vehicles to those used by the Council.

Assessment

  1. I appreciate Mr B is adamant that he saw a Council refuse vehicle. But in the absence of any video/photographic evidence or independent witnesses, I do not see that an investigation by the Ombudsman would enable us to establish what happened.
  2. So, with reference to paragraph 2 above, I do not consider the Ombudsman should investigate Mr B’s complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr B’s complaint. This is because an investigation is unlikely to enable us to establish whether the Council acted with fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings