North Somerset Council (18 017 518)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Nov 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s waste collection lorry parking outside his driveway access when waste is collected from a nearby care home. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of any significant injustice which would warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mr X, complains about the Council’s refuse collection lorry obstructing his driveway when the crew collects waste from a nearby care home. He says sometimes he has to wait to access his driveway on collection day. He wants the Council to take the vehicle onto the care home premises

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely we would find fault, or
  • the injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the Council.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered all the information which Mr X submitted with his complaint and he has commented on the draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X lives on a cul de sac which includes the entrance to a care home. The Council’s waste collection lorry reverses down the street and blocks his driveway when the crew collect waste from the care home. Mr X says on some occasions he has had to wait for the vehicle to move to exit his driveway.
  2. Mr X complained to the Council and asked for the vehicle to enter the care home grounds to collect the waste. The Council told him that this was not practical because the vehicle would damage the cobbled surface. It says the time taken to collect the waste is kept to a minimum.
  3. The Local Government Ombudsman is obliged by law to consider not only any fault which a complainant has alleged, but also the injustice caused to them as a direct consequence of that failure. In this case the Council has allowed the vehicle to park on the road whilst bins are wheeled to it for practical reasons. The collection time is only brief on a single weekday and there is insufficient inconvenience to Mr X or other residents which would suggest this is fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of any significant injustice which would warrant an investigation.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings