Swindon Borough Council (21 014 276)

Category : Environment and regulation > Pollution

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to Mr X’s reports of noise and toxic fumes coming from a neighbouring property. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Mr X, says the Council has failed to take action against noise and toxic fumes he has reported coming from a neighbouring property. He says his health is being adversely affected.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X, including the Council’s response to his complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X contacted the Council to report toxic fumes and machine noise coming from a neighbouring property.
  2. The Council investigated and considered the diary sheets Mr X had completed. However, it told him it could take no further action because it had not been able to identify a statutory nuisance for the noise or toxic fumes he had reported. It noted a similar complaint he had made about another nearby property at the beginning of 2021 and his view that the advanced notice given for the inspection had prevented the nuisance being witnessed. It told Mr X that its visit to the area at the end of 2021 for this second property complaint had been unannounced but again no nuisance had been witnessed.
  3. It is not our role to questions decisions a council takes if it follows the right steps and considers the relevant evidence and information. To date the Council has no evidence of a statutory nuisance and I have seen no evidence to suggest fault by the Council in its handling of the case.
  4. If Mr X has any new evidence to support his claim of nuisance, he can send this to the Council for its consideration.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings