London Borough of Ealing (25 005 015)
Category : Environment and regulation > Other
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 27 Jul 2025
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council issuing her a Fixed Penalty Notice for fly tipping. This is because Ms X can raise a defence against the issuing of the notice in court if she believes it was incorrectly issued and decides not to pay it.
The complaint
- Ms X complains the Council incorrectly issued her a Fixed Penalty Notice (FPN) for fly tipping.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
- We have the power to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. We may decide not to start an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been, raised within a court of law. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- The Council issued Ms X a FPN of £400 for fly tipping.
- Ms X said the FPN was incorrectly issued and made representations to the Council about it.
- The Council considered the information Ms X provided. It said the FPN was correctly issued and that should Ms X wish to dispute the matter further then she should await the court summons so that the matter can be decided via the courts.
- We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint. This is because Ms X can raise a defence against the issuing of the FPN in court if she believes it was incorrectly issued and wishes to challenge it rather than pay it. We are not an appeal body. We cannot decide whether or not the alleged offence was committed; whether the FPN was correctly issued nor whether Ms X is liable. These are matters the court can decide and this is the suitable route for Ms X to take if she wishes to challenge the issuing of the FPN rather than pay it.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because she can defend the matter in court if she considers the FPN was incorrectly issued.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman