Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council failed to replace bins at three bus stops, remove an unused storage box, or keep the public pathway clear of commercial bins. This is because the claimed injustice is not significant enough to warrant our involvement.

The complaint

1. Mr X complained the Council failed to:
1. replace litter bins at three bus stops;
2. remove an unused storage box in its area; and
3. keep pathways clear of commercial bins.
2. Mr X said the matter caused him frustration.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

4. I considered information provided by the complainant.
5. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

6. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because the claimed injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.
7. Our role is to consider complaints where the person bringing the complaint has suffered significant personal injustice as a direct result of the actions or inactions of the organisation. This means we will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures. We will not normally investigate a complaint where the alleged loss or injustice is not a serious or significant matter.
8. Mr X has not experienced a significant personal injustice. Consequently, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

9. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the claimed injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman