North Hertfordshire District Council (25 000 531)

Category : Environment and regulation > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a vehicle the Council removed and destroyed because it believed it to be abandoned. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council removed and destroyed his vehicle because they classed it as being abandoned.
  2. Mr X said this has caused him stress and a financial loss.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained the Council removed and destroyed his vehicle because they had classed it as abandoned. Mr X said he did not receive correspondence about this because the Driving and Vehicle Licencing Agency (DVLA) did not provide the Council with his correct address, as well as him having health issues.
  2. Based on the information available, it is unlikely we would find fault in the Council’s handling of this abandoned vehicle, given they made reasonable attempts to notify Mr X before they removed it. Therefore, we will not investigate the complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings