London Borough of Sutton (24 014 528)

Category : Environment and regulation > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Dec 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about being issued a fixed penalty notice for fly-tipping. This is because Mr X can raise a defence against the issuing of the notice in court.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains he has been incorrectly issued a fixed penalty notice for fly-tipping.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We have the power to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been, raised within a court of law. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council about it issuing him with a fixed penalty notice (FPN) for fly-tipping a cardboard box containing pieces of timber and litter. Mr X said the offence was not committed and the items were donated to homeless people rather than fly-tipped.
  2. The Council says the fixed penalty notice was correctly issued. It provided Mr X with details of the process should he wish to defend the matter in court.
  3. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because Mr X can raise a defence against the issuing of the FPN in court if he believes it was incorrectly issued. We are not an appeal body and we cannot decide whether or not the alleged offence was committed nor whether Mr X is liable. These are matters for the courts to decide if Mr X wishes to challenge the FPN.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he can defend the matter in court

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings