Gloucestershire County Council (24 010 464)

Category : Environment and regulation > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the authority’s failure to take action over a complaint about domestic fire safety. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the authority’s failure to take any action over his report of a wooden garage structure built by a neighbour which he considers to be a fire risk.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the authority.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says his neighbour built a wooden garage structure with a plastic roof which connects to the eaves of his property. He is concerned that there is no fire protection from the temporary structure and wanted the fire authority to investigate and take action if it was a danger.
  2. The fire authority has no enforcement powers to deal with domestic structures, it is limited to business and commercial property only. The local planning authority is responsible for building control matters and this is part of the District Council which is a separate authority. It would have to consider if there are any safety implications which are different to those associated with any other domestic garage or outbuilding not requiring planning approval.
  3. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong, regardless of whether someone disagrees with the decision the organisation made.

There is insufficient evidence of any fault in the authority’s response to Mr X’s complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the authority’s failure to take action over a complaint about domestic fire safety. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings