London Borough of Harrow (24 002 708)

Category : Environment and regulation > Other

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 10 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Fixed Penalty Notice for fly-tipping. This is because the Council has decided to issue a refund.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains about a Fixed Penalty Notice (FPN) he received for alleged fly-tipping. He says two parcels were stolen from him and he believes the person responsible threw away the packaging. Mr X wants the Council to cancel the FPN.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council. This includes email correspondence about the FPN and an update from the Council. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council found an envelope amongst dumped rubbish with Mr X’s name and address on it. The Council issued Mr X with a FPN.
  2. Mr X challenged the FPN. He said he had reported to the police that two parcels had been stolen, and he thought the perpetrator had thrown away the packaging showing his details. Mr X sent an acknowledgment from the police showing he had reported a crime.
  3. The Council considered Mr X’s challenge but did not cancel the FPN. Mr X paid the fine.
  4. In response to my enquiries the Council said the information Mr X provided from the police was not specific to show the crime report related to the stolen parcels. But, the Council also told me it should have asked Mr X for more evidence. The Council has decided to issue Mr X with a refund.
  5. The Council should have asked Mr X for more information about the crime report. However, I will not start an investigation because the Council has cancelled the FPN and will issue a refund to Mr X. This is a satisfactory outcome to the complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because the Council has provided a satisfactory remedy.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings