What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Birmingham City Council (23 018 114)

Category : Environment and regulation > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Apr 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions in issuing Ms X with a Community Protection Warning. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council issued her with a Community Protection Warning (CPW) when fly tippers dumped rubbish on land she leases. She says she did nothing wrong and that her reputation has been tarnished and she has been punished for the actions of others. She wants the Council to revoke the Warning.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council, including its response to the complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued Ms X with a CPW following a complaint it received of fly tipped waste on land leased to Ms X. It made clear it did not suspect Ms X to be directly responsible for depositing the waste but explained to her that as a leaseholder of private land, she was responsible for its maintenance and that the CPW had been correctly issued to her.
  2. It is most unfortunate that Ms X is responsible for the actions of others who have dumped waste on land she leases. However, there is no evidence to suggest there has been fault by the Council. It properly followed its procedures and issued the CPW to the liable person.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings