Plymouth City Council (22 007 378)

Category : Environment and regulation > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Sep 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council wrongly took a gate from outside Mr X’s home as it is unlikely we can achieve any meaningful outcome for Mr X and ultimately he has the right to seek a remedy in court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council wrongly removed a gate that had been propped up against his property for less than an hour. Mr X wants the Council to pay for a replacement gate.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has told Mr X there is no evidence to corroborate his view that it took the gate. It has also said that had it taken it away, it would have done so legitimately as the gate was placed on public highway and so constituted fly tipping. The Council’s insurers have also considered Mr X’s claim for the gate but have rejected it.
  2. We will not investigate as it is unlikely we can add to what the Council has already said or achieve the outcome Mr X seeks, in the absence of any corroborating evidence.
  3. Ultimately, if Mr X considers the Council was negligent in taking his gate, he has the right to seek compensation in the county court.
  4. For these reasons, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is unlikely we can add to what the Council has already said or achieve the outcome Mr X seeks.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings