London Borough of Hounslow (22 007 322)

Category : Environment and regulation > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Sep 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Fixed Penalty Notice the Council issued, and subsequent court proceedings against Mr X for littering. Mr X used his right of appeal to court, and Mr X’s concerns about the unclear status of his case are best directed to the Courts and Tribunals Service Centre.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council issued court proceedings against him for littering but has not then communicated any further with him since. He has gone to significant expense to defend himself, for no action to have progressed a year later. Mr X says he is left with the fear of a criminal record. He wants the Council to confirm whether it intends to prosecute him, and refund his legal costs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  2. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider the complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued Mr X a Fixed Penalty Notice in 2021 for littering. He appealed this notice, and submitted his not guilty representations to the court after receiving a procedure notice. The law prevents us from considering events up to this point, because Mr X used his right of appeal to court.
  2. The court would normally have written to Mr X advising him of next steps. It is open to Mr X to contact the Courts and Tribunals Service Centre for information about his case, including whether any results have been recorded. As it is the court, and not the Council, that would have been responsible for advising Mr X about the progress of his case, there is not a good reason for us to investigate this complaint and Mr X should instead direct his concerns to the Courts and Tribunals Service.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we cannot consider complaints about court proceedings, and Mr X's concerns about the unclear status of his case are best directed to the Courts and Tribunals Service Centre.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings