City of York Council (21 018 128)

Category : Environment and regulation > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 May 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s handling of matters relating to the clean-up of paint and graffiti which had been targeted towards his home. We will not investigate the complaint because an investigation is unlikely to add to the Council’s own investigation or lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Mr X, complains about the Council’s delay and poor quality of the cleaning it carried out to remove paint and graffiti which had been directed towards his home. He says he would have dealt with the clean-up himself much quicker had he known the limited nature of its assistance.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I gave Mr X the opportunity to comment on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council about the quality of the assistance it provided in helping to clean up paint and graffiti which had been targeted at his home and about its delay in responding to him.
  2. The Council explained it had removed what it could and while I understand Mr X was not happy with the action taken by the Council, I do not consider an investigation by the Ombudsman would be likely to significantly add to that already carried out by the Council or lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because an investigation is unlikely to add to the Council’s own investigation or lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings