Liverpool City Council (25 004 968)

Category : Environment and regulation > Noise

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council proposes to gather evidence in Mr X’s complaint about suffering noise nuisance. There is insufficient evidence of fault to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s request to place noise recording equipment in his property. Mr X says this is unfair and an invasion of his privacy.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant which includes the Council’s response. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Councils rely on suitably qualified officers to gather evidence. Officers may ask the complainant to use noise-monitoring equipment.
  2. In Mr X’s complaint, the Council asks to place noise recording equipment in his property. Mr X says this is unfair and an invasion of his privacy.
  3. The Council said to Mr X that any statutory nuisance investigation must consider the impact of the noise from within Mr X’s property.
  4. We will not investigate. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.
  1. The Environmental Protection Act 1990 defines a statutory nuisance as one which ‘unreasonably and substantially interferes with the use or enjoyment of a home or other premises’. So, we are unlikely to find fault with the Council’s proposed method of gathering evidence from Mr X’s home.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings