Coventry City Council (23 019 417)

Category : Environment and regulation > Noise

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 May 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of the complainant’s reports of noise nuisance by a neighbour. We could not achieve a worthwhile or different outcome for the complainant.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s handling of his reports of noise nuisance by a neighbour.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We can investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. So, we do not start an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation, or
  • we are satisfied with the action the Council has already taken.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6) & (7), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered:
    • information provided by Mr X and the Council, which included some of their complaint correspondence.
    • information on the Council’s website about how it responds to reports of noise nuisance.
    • the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has already apologised for misfiling the diary sheets Mr X submitted in mid-2023. I consider the apology was a satisfactory way to address this part of the complaint, so we will not pursue it further.
  2. Furthermore, it is not the Ombudsman’s role to decide whether a statutory noise nuisance is occurring; that is a matter for the Council. It is has visited Mr X’s property, sent an advisory letter to the neighbour, and encouraged Mr X to call its noise witnessing service so that officers may assess the noise for themselves. The Ombudsman could not achieve anything further for Mr X, so we will not investigate this part of the complaint either.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate ’s complaint because it would not lead to a worthwhile or different outcome for Mr X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings