Liverpool City Council (23 012 255)

Category : Environment and regulation > Noise

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Aug 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to a report of noise nuisance. The Council responded, investigated, and decided to take no action. It also investigated Ms X’s complaint about this matter and further investigation by us would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Ms X said the Council was wrong not to deal with her complaint about noise from a nearby business premises as a statutory noise nuisance. She also said it should have served an abatement notice for any noise occurring between 11pm and 7am. Ms X said the ongoing noise has caused her disruption.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained to the Council about its response to an ongoing disturbance caused by a nearby business premises. She was also unhappy because previous visits by the Council’s Environmental Health Officers (EHO) about the same matter, had done nothing to stop the noise.
  2. In its complaint reply, the Council highlighted the following:
    • An EHO investigated, and visited her and the premises to witness the noise;
    • it decided the noise was not a statutory noise nuisance, and;
    • it spoke to the management at the premises to get it minimise any noise.
  3. During the subsequent complaint investigation, the Council also offered to revisit Ms X at an appropriate time. Because of the Council’s response and the actions it has taken and offered to take, further investigation by us would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings