Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council (22 007 302)

Category : Environment and regulation > Noise

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Oct 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council investigate reports of noise. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will call Mr X, complains about loud music coming from a local business near his home. Mr X says the Council installed noise monitoring but colluded with the person making the noise so that they did not play music whilst recording was taking place. Mr X wants the Council to issue the business with an abatement notice.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. The Council acted appropriately by installing noise monitoring equipment. The recordings were subsequently analysed but no evidence of a noise nuisance was found. The Council has offered to install noise monitoring equipment again, but Mr X has declined. I appreciate that Mr X says that music is being played too loudly, but the Council cannot take any further action, such as the issuing of an abatement notice, unless it finds evidence of a noise nuisance. Mr X has not provided any evidence to support his claim that the Council and business owner has colluded in this matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings