London Borough of Wandsworth (22 005 189)

Category : Environment and regulation > Noise

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Aug 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to investigate her complaint about noise from building works during 2020. This was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Miss X could not have complained to us sooner.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained about the Council’s failure to respond properly to her complaint about noise from a building development near her home during the Covid-19 lockdown period in 2020. She says the work should have been postponed until people were not at home from work and that proper noise monitoring should have taken place.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X says the Council should have postponed work which was carried out during March-May 2020 during the COVID-19 lockdown period. She complained to the Council in April 2020 and says she did not receive a proper response. She says the Council should have considered the levels of noise generated and that it should have postponed the work until after the pandemic when fewer people were at home.
  2. The Council apologised for its failure to address her complaint properly but does not consider that it could have either prevented the works taking place or sufficiently restricted the hours of work. The works were not subject to any government restrictions at the time and were programmed within normal daylight working hours. Because they involved pile-driving to support a railway embankment there were limits to the mitigation which the developers could employ.
  3. It was reasonable for Miss X to complain about the Council’s response to her noise complaint in 2020. There is no evidence to suggest that Miss X could not have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate her complaint about noise from building works during 2020. This was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Miss X could not have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings