Tandridge District Council (25 013 108)

Category : Environment and regulation > Licensing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate the actions of the Council in connection with renewal of licence applications for a dog boarding business and a cattery. This is because the complainant has used his statutory right of appeal to the Magistrate’s Court, so this lies outside our jurisdiction.

The complaint

  1. In summary, Mr X complains about the Council’s actions in connection with its refusal to renew his licences for a dog boarding business and a cattery.
  2. Mr X says he was led to believe by the Council that its previous dispensations would continue.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. The courts have said that where someone has sought a remedy by way of proceedings in any court of law, we cannot investigate. This is the case even if the appeal did not or could not provide a complete remedy for all the injustice claimed. (R v The Commissioner for Local Administration ex parte PH (1999) EHCA Civ 916)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The law specifically gives licensing applicants a right of appeal against a Council decision.
  2. Mr X has exercised his legal right to appeal the Council’s licensing decisions to the Magistrates Court. This prohibits the Ombudsman from investigating any aspect of this complaint including any ancillary matters, such as failures to respond to his correspondence or being led to believe the licences would be renewed.
  3. Mr X could have presented his concerns to the court. It would then have been for the court to decide the merits of his case.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint because he has used his right to appeal to the magistrates’ court, so his complaint lies outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings