London Borough of Croydon (25 009 433)

Category : Environment and regulation > Licensing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council dealt with a licensing application. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained the Council has not followed the correct process when considering a licensing application.
  2. Ms X would like the Council to reverse its decision or to compensate her as she says the decision has caused her financial losses.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained the Council had not followed the correct process when it extended the terms of an existing licence for a neighbouring property. She complained she could not find any record of the original licence.
  2. The Council explained the application was for a new licence and clarified how it followed the correct process in reaching its decision for that application.
  3. The issues raised appear to be based on a misunderstanding rather than any fault in the Council’s decision making.
  4. Ms X also raised issue with the way the Council has handled her complaint. The Council has accepted there were delays and have apologised and offered a symbolic payment in recognition of the impact of this.
  5. We do not investigate complaints about complaint handling where we are not investigating the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault in the way the Council made its decision to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings