London Borough of Newham (25 002 773)

Category : Environment and regulation > Licensing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council failing to email the complainant with a penalty fine. This is because we are unlikely to find sufficient evidence of fault.

The complaint

  1. In short, Mr X says the Council acted unfairly by posting a letter to his previous address and not emailing him. Mr X says he was unaware that he had been fined £5000.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says he was fined for not responding to a letter seeking information on whether his rented property was operating as a House of Multiple Occupation (HMO). He says it wasn’t, but the Council imposed a fine.
  2. The Council says it carried out a search via the Land Registry which showed the same address the letter was sent to. And that ultimately it was a condition of Mr X’s landlord licence that he directly inform the licensing team of his change of address. And he did not do this.
  3. As a service improvement the Council said it would send documents via email too in future.
  4. We will not investigate. This is because the letter appears to have been correctly issued in line with licence terms and conditions and we are unlikely to find sufficient evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint as there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings