Bristol City Council (19 015 501)
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: Mr X complains that the Council did not apply the proper discounts before charging him for a property licence. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because the Council has agreed to take appropriate action to remedy any injustice to Mr X.
The complaint
- Mr X complains that the Council did not apply the proper discount before charging him for a property licence.
- Mr X also complains that the Council does not do enough to tell new landlords that their property needs a licence.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions a council has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered the complaint and the information provided by Mr X.
- I asked the Council for its comments and considered its response.
- I have written to Mr X with my draft decision and given him an opportunity to comment.
What I found
- Mr X is the landlord of a property which needs a selective licence.
- In November 2018 the Council wrote to Mr X to tell him that his property was unlicensed. Mr X applied for the licence.
- The Council charges fees for selective licences. The Council adds an extra £100 to the fee to cover investigation time for properties it has found to be unlicensed.
- The Council also offers a discount of £100 to applicants who provide all the needed safety and performance certificates either prior to or within three months of a licence being granted.
- In May 2019, the Council wrote to Mr X outlining the fees due. The Council charged Mr X the extra £100 fee for unlicensed properties. It did not apply any discounts to his application fee.
- Mr X provided copies of two of the three safety and performance certificates needed to benefit from the £100 discount. He did not provide an electricity installation condition report (EICR).
- Mr X says the Council told him that he did not need to provide the third certificate. The Council does not have a record of whether it told Mr X that he did need to provide the third certificate.
Analysis
- The Council does not have to tell new landlords that their property needs a licence. It is the responsibility of the landlord to make sure their property has all the necessary licences.
- The Ombudsman should not investigate this part of the complaint because it is unlikely we would find fault by the Council.
- Mr X believes that he provided all the certificates needed to benefit from the discount.
- The Ombudsman should not investigate this part of the complaint further. We cannot say that the Council properly advised Mr X in this matter but its agreement to apply the discount provides a suitable remedy. If we were to investigate, it is unlikely that we would recommend anything further.
Agreed action
- The Council has agreed to apply the £100 discount to Mr X’s fee if he provides the electricity installation condition report.
Final decision
- The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because we are satisfied with the actions the Council proposes to take.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman