London Borough of Hillingdon (23 008 685)

Category : Environment and regulation > Cemeteries and crematoria

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Oct 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council maintains a cemetery. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, I shall call Mrs X, complains the Council treated the grass around her late husband’s headstone with weedkiller, destroying the grass.
  2. She says she finds this distressing and wants the Council to return to using a strimmer to cut the grass close to the gravestones.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X including the Council’s responses to her complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X is upset the Council treated the long grass around her late husband’s headstone with weedkiller instead of strimming it.
  2. The Council has advised this is general practice in all its cemeteries as it minimises possible damage to headstones and other items placed on graves. It has agreed to replace the turf around her husband’s headstone as a gesture of goodwill but will not change its approach of using weedkiller in general as it prevents damage from strimmers and lawnmowers.
  3. Photographs from Google maps of the cemetery dated 2018 shows signs that weedkiller has been used around the gravestones.
  4. I do not dismiss Mrs X’s concerns or the distress she had felt. However, further investigation is unlikely to lead to a different outcome as we cannot dictate to the Council how it maintains its cemeteries.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because further investigation is unlikely to lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings