Test Valley Borough Council (25 012 067)

Category : Environment and regulation > Antisocial behaviour

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Council officer’s conduct during a meeting that Mr X was involved in. There is no worthwhile outcome achievable by investigating this matter.

The complaint

  1. Mr X was unhappy because a Council officer interrupted him at meeting he was involved in, during a time when he said he was providing a victim impact statement. Mr X said this left him feeling that his experience was not important to the Council.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr complained to the Council, saying a family member had told him that during a meeting, a Council officer, had shaken their head and disagreed verbally with something he was saying, during his victim impact statement.
  2. The Council responded to Mr X’s complaint and clarified its position about what the officer was disagreeing with.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint, because there is no worthwhile outcome we could achieve by investigating. Our role is not to investigate complaints about incivility. We only investigate those complaints where there is clear administrative fault by the Council, and it is of a type or scale there is a significant public interest in exposing and correcting it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings