Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council (25 008 335)

Category : Environment and regulation > Antisocial behaviour

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s response to his light pollution concerns. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. In short, Mr X complains about the Council’s decision that light pollution does not represent a statutory nuisance.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  3. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X disagrees with the Council decision that the light pollution does not represent a statutory nuisance under the Environmental Protection Act 1990.
  2. According to the Council’s complaints response, two officers from the Council carried out a site visit before reaching their decision. This decision was reviewed and upheld by a senior officer.
  3. Based on the information I have seen, the Council responded to Mr X’s complaints in line with its policy, and therefore there is not enough evidence to warrant an investigation.
  4. It is open to Mr X to take out his own private action under s82 of the Environmental Protection Act in the magistrate’s court.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings