Leeds City Council (25 004 801)

Category : Environment and regulation > Antisocial behaviour

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with reports of anti-social behaviour. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained the Council had not dealt with her reports of anti-social behaviour (ASB) properly. She said other residents had made false reports about her own behaviour. She said she has been caused distress. She wants the Council to stop people trespassing on her property and to take action against the other residents.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate complaints about the provision or management of social housing by a council acting as a registered social housing provider. (Local Government Act 1974, paragraph 5A schedule 5, as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  4. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about how the Council has responded to her reports of ASB. The Council’s case records demonstrate it has acted on her reports, by speaking to her and the alleged perpetrators. Its records show that both parties gave differing versions of events, therefore it could not substantiate Ms X’s allegations of ASB. The Council update Miss X with its findings. The Council also liaised with the Police and reviewed video footage which Miss X believed demonstrate people trespassing on her property. The Council confirmed the people were not causing ASB and were walking past her door.
  2. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint. The Council has explained why it is not taking action. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.
  3. Miss X wants the Council to take tenancy enforcement against her neighbours. That is not an outcome we can achieve, nor can we investigate the action of the Council when it is acting as a social landlord.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings