Stratford-on-Avon District Council (25 004 143)

Category : Environment and regulation > Antisocial behaviour

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about comments made by a Council officer about Mr X’s request for an anti-social behaviour case review. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about comments a Council officer made regarding his request for an anti-social behaviour case review.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained.
    (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained after he made freedom of information request and saw comments made by a Council officer in an internal email about his anti-social behaviour review request.
  2. The Council did not uphold the complaint and explained that the comments were made whilst asking for advice about the policy and the situation.
  3. Mr X brought the complaint to us as he remains unhappy. There is no evidence the Council is at fault in how it responded to his request or that the comments made caused Mr X a significant injustice. An investigation would therefore be an improper use of resources.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings