East Suffolk Council (25 002 531)

Category : Environment and regulation > Antisocial behaviour

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of anti-social behaviour. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council has failed to investigate his complaints about anti-social behaviour from another resident. Mr X says he and his family are prisoners in their own home and their health has suffered adversely.
  2. Mr X would like the Council to investigate his concerns and work with him.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant which includes the Council’s response.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has considered Mr X’s reports. It has advised him that it has received counter allegations against him.
  2. The Council has decided Mr X is involved in a neighbour dispute for which mediation is the most appropriate remedy.
  3. We will not investigate. This is because I have seen information showing the Council has considered Mr X’s information and reached a professional judgement that informal action in the form of mediation is required. That Mr X disagrees with the Council’s decision is not necessarily evidence of the Council acting with fault.
  4. It is open to Mr X to take his own action under section 82 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 against his neighbour. If the court decides Mr X is suffering a nuisance, it can order the person responsible to take action to stop or limit it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings