Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (25 002 107)

Category : Environment and regulation > Antisocial behaviour

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about maintenance of a neighbour’s garden or a strip of land next to a fence. This is because we have no remit to consider the Council’s action in connection with its management of its social housing and any remaining injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council have failed to ensure her neighbours maintain their garden and the council have failed to maintain a strip of land they own behind her garden.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate complaints about the provision or management of social housing by a council acting as a registered social housing provider. (Local Government Act 1974, paragraph 5A schedule 5, as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X lives next door to a property owned by the council and rented as social housing. Her garden also backs onto a walkway owned by the council.
  2. Miss X says the garden at the neighbour’s garden is overgrown and that this has caused her issues selling her home as well as providing harbourage to rodents.
  3. Miss X complains the Council have failed to take adequate steps to ensure the garden is properly maintained.
  4. We cannot investigate this element of the complaint because we have no jurisdiction to consider complaints in connection with the Council’s management of its social housing.
  5. Miss X also complains that the land to the rear of her property is overgrown and preventing her from accessing her fence.
  6. The Council have agreed to clear the land behind her property and arrange for twice-yearly maintenance. I recognise Miss X is unhappy at the Council’s response, but we will not investigate as the outstanding injustice caused is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because we do not have jurisdiction to investigate matters relating to the Council’s management of its social housing and any remaining injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings