Surrey Heath Borough Council (25 000 285)

Category : Environment and regulation > Antisocial behaviour

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint the Council was not involving small businesses in discussions about anti-social behaviour. Further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council failed to include small businesses in discussions about anti-social behaviour in the town centre. He wants the Council to include small businesses to help address the problem.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
    • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement, or
    • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In its response to Mr X’s complaint, the Council confirmed it had met with the Police and some retail premises around anti-social behaviour. It said it was not practical for the Council to meet regularly with small business, but to work with group representatives that could feedback on local issues. It suggested Mr X feedback any concerns about anti-social behaviour through the Business Improvement District (BID).
  2. Although Mr X is unhappy with the Council’s response, we will not investigate. The Council has explained why it did not invite small business to the anti-social behaviour meeting and its preference for working with group representatives. It has explained Mr X can direct his concerns to the BID. There is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council has considered the matter to justify our involvement. Further investigation by the Ombudsman will not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because further investigation will not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings