Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 51938 results

  • City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (24 015 519)

    Statement Not upheld Safeguarding 13-Feb-2025

    Summary: There is no fault by the Council in the way it dealt with a safeguarding referral made by Mr X about carers incorrectly placing his leg in a wheelchair. There is also no fault in the way the Council responded to Mr X’s complaint about the above.

  • Sunderland City Council (24 015 520)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 13-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council adding the complainant to its Employee Protection Register. There is not enough evidence of fault in the way the Council reached its decision, and the Information Commissioner is better placed to consider data protection matters.

  • Vale Of White Horse District Council (24 015 596)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 13-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to review a neighbourhood plan following the outcome of a judicial review in 2017. The complaint is made too late, and we have seen no reason to exercise discretion on this point.

  • Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (24 015 625)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Charging 13-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this late complaint about delays in the Council issuing an invoice for care. There is not a good reason for the delay in Mrs X bringing the matter to the Ombudsman.

  • Halton Borough Council (24 015 677)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Land 13-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about contaminated land. The complaint is late and there is no good reason why Ms X could not have approached us sooner.

  • Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (24 015 702)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 13-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the actions of the Council’s social workers in the course of their involvement with the care of the complainant’s daughter. This is because investigation would not result in the outcomes the complainant wants.

  • Blackpool Borough Council (24 015 752)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Leisure and culture 13-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to a complaint about the management of allotments. There is no significant injustice. Additionally, the Council have responded to Mrs X’s complaint and further investigation by us would not lead to a different outcome.

  • North Yorkshire Council (24 015 758)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Alternative provision 13-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council is at fault in failing to make suitable alternative educational provision for the complainant’s son. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault on the Council’s part to warrant investigation.

  • North Hertfordshire District Council (24 015 901)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 13-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the conduct of two Council planning officers during an application for a development near her property and how the Council responded to her complaints. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council in the planning process to warrant investigation. There is insufficient significant personal injustice to Mrs X from the officer conduct complained of, nor from any other issue raised, to warrant investigation. We do not investigate council complaint‑handling where we are not investigating the core issues giving rise to the complaint.

  • West Northamptonshire Council (24 016 114)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 13-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a delay in registering a property as an Asset of Community Value. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. The complaint is late and we have seen no reason why the complainant could not have contacted us much sooner.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings