Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 52968 results

  • Lancashire County Council (24 009 525)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Residential care 08-Jun-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about Mr Z’s care home neglecting him during his stay. This is because an investigation is not likely to reach any different findings or outcomes.

  • London Borough of Bromley (24 009 645)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 08-Jun-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Miss X’s liability for council tax. The Council has since exempt Miss X for one period and the remaining period in dispute is outside of our jurisdiction. Therefore, investigation by us would not achieve anything worthwhile.

  • Essex County Council (24 013 905)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 08-Jun-2025

    Summary: Miss X complained the Council did not provide her child, Y, with the provisions contained in her Education, Health and Care Plan. Miss X also complained the Council did not review Y’s Plan and that it poorly communicated with her. The Council was at fault which caused injustice to Y and Miss X. The Council will take action to remedy the injustice caused.

  • London Borough of Ealing (24 014 229)

    Statement Upheld Homelessness 08-Jun-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s offer of accommodation. It would have been reasonable for Mr X to ask the Council for a review.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 014 372)

    Statement Upheld Allocations 08-Jun-2025

    Summary: Miss B complained that the Council kept closing her housing applications. We found that the Council failed to clearly communicate the consequences of not providing supporting documents with her initial housing application, which led to its closure. The Council then closed the next two applications Miss B made, without properly explaining why it had done so. This caused Miss B avoidable frustration and inconvenience and delayed her ability to join the housing register. The Council has agreed to assesses Miss B’s application, and if she qualifies, it backdates her award date. The Council will also apologise, make a symbolic payment to Miss B and make service improvements.

  • Cheshire West & Chester Council (24 015 882)

    Statement Upheld School transport 08-Jun-2025

    Summary: Mr B complained the Council refused to provide free home to school transport for his child, which he said was contrary to its policy. We found fault in how the Council described its policy, which did not explain how it measured home to school distance in all cases. It agreed to our recommendation to amend this. However, we did not consider this fault caused Mr B injustice. This is because he knew before choosing his child’s secondary school, which school the Council considered the nearest qualifying school for home to school transport purposes.

  • Buckinghamshire Council (24 016 280)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 08-Jun-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council not authorising a school place offered to her daughter, or naming that school in her daughter’s Education, Health and Care Plan. This is because she has already used her right of appeal at Tribunal.

  • East Riding of Yorkshire Council (24 022 081)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 08-Jun-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council’s management of its rented property next door to the complainant’s. We cannot investigate complaints about the management of housing by social housing landlords.

  • City of York Council (24 022 367)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 08-Jun-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council racially discriminated against Mrs X. We cannot determine whether the Council has breached the Equality Act 2010 or determine whether the Council is liable for her financial losses. These are matters for the courts.

  • Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council (24 022 529)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 08-Jun-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s assessment of his risk and about a lack of contact with his children. The law prevents us from investigating matters that are subject to court proceedings.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings