Milton Keynes Council (25 016 740)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s assessment and decision-making processes following a SEND Tribunal hearing. If she is unhappy with the school named in the Education, Health and Care Plan, it is reasonable for her to submit a further appeal to the Tribunal. If she considers the Council has not complied with the Tribunal’s direction, she can refer this back to the Tribunal for consideration.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council named a school in her child, Y’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan before consulting with the school to determine if it could meet his needs. She says this was unlawful and has caused distress and a loss of trust. She wants the Council to apologise and improve its practices.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the Tribunal in this decision statement.
  3. The courts have established that if someone has appealed to the Tribunal, the law says we cannot investigate any matter which was part of, was connected to, or could have been part of, the appeal to the Tribunal. The same restrictions apply where someone had a right of appeal to the Tribunal and it was reasonable for them to have used that right. (R (on application of Milburn) v Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman [2023] EWCA Civ 207)
  4. The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) Rules 2008/2699 (‘Tribunal Procedure Rules’) give the Tribunal the power to do the following: 
  • Regulate its own procedure. The Tribunal Procedure Rules give the Tribunal extensive case management powers. 
  • Take ‘such action as it considers just’ if a party fails to comply with a requirement in the Tribunal Procedure Rules, a Practice Direction or a direction by the Tribunal. 

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In 2025, the Tribunal ordered the Council to name a special school in Section I of Y’s EHC Plan. The Council finalised Y’s plan naming a special school, shortly after the Tribunal Order.
  2. Ms X complained the Council finalised the plan naming the school before it had consulted with the school to determine if it could meet Y’s needs. She said this was unlawful and put pressure on the school into offering him a place. She also complained the Council appears to have pre-determined his next placement, which is inappropriate and has caused distress.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint. The Council amended Y’s plan and named a special school, which appears to be in line with the Tribunal directions. If Miss X was dissatisfied with the school named in the amended EHC Plan, she had a further right of appeal to the Tribunal, which it was reasonable for her to use.
  4. I accept Miss X is dissatisfied with the Council’s assessment and decision making regarding the named school, but we cannot investigate this. This is because any dissatisfaction with its decision making is connected to the decision to name the school, which can be raised as part of any appeal.
  5. If Miss X considers the Council has not complied with the Tribunal Order, she can refer this back to the Tribunal for consideration. The Tribunal has wide ranging powers to regulate its own procedures. It can take action as it considers necessary, if a party fails to comply with a Tribunal direction.
  6. We only consider complaints about events that have happened, so we cannot consider a complaint about any potential future placement decisions regarding Y’s education.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint. If she is dissatisfied with the school named in Y’s Education, Health and Care Plan, it is reasonable for her to appeal to the Tribunal. If she considers the Council has not complied with the Tribunal’s direction, she can refer this back to the Tribunal for its consideration.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings