Coventry City Council (25 014 178)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an Education, Health and Care assessment and plan because it is reasonable for the complainant to appeal to the Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council failed to advise her of a psychometric assessment that was undertaken at her child’s school and it failed to include the assessment in the Education, Health and Care (EHC) needs assessment of her child. Mrs X also complains the Council has named a school in her child’s EHC Plan that cannot meet his needs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the Tribunal in this decision statement.
  4. We cannot investigate most complaints about what happens in schools. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5, paragraph 5(2), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint.
  2. It is reasonable for Mrs X to complain directly to the school about its failure to advise her of the psychometric test. It was also reasonable for Mrs X to use her right to appeal the Council’s EHC Needs Assessment decision if she was unhappy with the information the Council considered when making its decision.
  3. Mrs X says the Council has named a school in her child’s EHC Plan that cannot meet his needs. The Tribunal considers appeals against the content of EHC Plans. The Tribunal can direct changes to an EHC Plan, we cannot. It is reasonable for Mrs X to appeal to the Tribunal if she is unhappy with the school named in her child’s EHC Plan.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it is reasonable for her to appeal to the Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings