West Northamptonshire Council (25 008 805)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the content of her child’s Education, Health and Care Plan including the named school, or how the Council delivered education to Y. This is because Mrs X appealed to a tribunal, and the law says we cannot investigate.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council:
      1. made a final Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan for her child, Y, that does not reflect their needs;
      2. named a school in section I of the EHC Plan that cannot meet Y’s needs; and
      3. failed to organise alternative education for Y when they were unable to attend the school due to their mental health.
  2. Mrs X said the matter caused her distress. She said it affected Y’s education.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the Tribunal in this decision statement.
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaints. This is because Mrs X appealed the content of Y’s EHC Plan to the SEND Tribunal. The law says we cannot investigate any matter which is or has been subject to a tribunal appeal.
  2. The SEND Tribunal will now consider the content of the EHC Plan including how it reflects Y’s needs and the named school in section I.
  3. The reason Y is not receiving the content of their EHC Plan is too closely related to the matter appealed. Consequently, the law says the Ombudsman cannot investigate how the Council delivered either the content of the EHC Plan, or how it organised any alternative provision for Y.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint because she appealed to a tribunal, and the law says we cannot investigate.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings