London Borough of Redbridge (25 008 257)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) needs assessment process and its decision not to her issue her child with an EHC Plan. There is a right of appeal to a tribunal which it is reasonable for her to use.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains there were flaws in the Council’s Education Health and Care (EHC) needs assessment process for her child, Y. She says a flawed assessment has led to an incorrect decision not to issue Y with an EHC Plan.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The courts have established that if someone has appealed (or could have appealed) to a tribunal, the law says we cannot investigate any matter which was part of, was connected to, or could have been part of the appeal. (R (on application of Milburn) v Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman [2023] EWCA Civ 207)
  4. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained about the Educational Psychology (EP) assessment completed as part of Y’s EHC needs assessment. She said the assessor did not consider relevant documents or observe Y in the classroom before completing their report. She said the report did not reflect Y’s needs and she disagreed with the Council’s decision not to issue Y with an EHC Plan.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint. Ms X has a right of appeal to the Tribunal about the decision not to issue Y with an EHC Plan and it is reasonable for her to use this right. If Ms X considers a flawed EP assessment led to an incorrect decision, she can raise this as part of the Tribunal process. The Tribunal has wide ranging powers and can order fresh assessments as it considers necessary, as part of its proceedings.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is a right of appeal to the Tribunal which it is reasonable for her to use.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings